Which of the following assessments is considered highly valid in measuring practical skills?

Performance tests are regarded as highly valid when it comes to measuring practical skills because they evaluate an individual's ability to perform specific tasks or activities that are directly related to the job. These assessments often involve actual demonstrations of skills in a controlled environment, allowing for an objective measurement of a candidate's capabilities. For example, a performance test for a software developer might involve writing code to solve a problem, allowing evaluators to assess technical proficiency in real-time.

This direct observational approach provides valuable insight into how a candidate applies their knowledge and skills in practice, making performance tests particularly effective for roles that require hands-on abilities. As a result, the outcomes of these assessments closely correlate with job performance, leading to their classification as highly valid measures of practical skills. Other assessment types may not focus as specifically on real-world application, which can affect their validity in measuring practical competencies.